All work

Case / 005 · The readiness problem

The project was sold before it was ready.

The promise was already made. The content, people, controls, and technology were not. Starting development would make the schedule look healthier for a few weeks—and the failure more expensive later.

What was missing

A signed scope is not the same thing as a ready project.

A client purchased six modules, two workshops, a credential, AI-generated practice, LMS integration — on a four-month timeline.

  • SMEs unavailable
  • Source content incomplete
  • Accessibility undefined
  • LMS assumptions unverified
  • AI review controls absent
  • Facilitation ownership unclear

Your turn · Ten-point check

Would you let development start?

Change the status of each category and watch the executive recommendation respond. The starting point reflects the evidence in this fictional brief—not a neutral default.

Business alignment
Instructional integrity
Content readiness
Technology feasibility
Resource capacity
Schedule
Governance
AI risk
Accessibility
Measurement

From anxiety to action

“I am worried about it” is not a risk plan.

RiskProb.ImpactEvidenceOwnerMitigationResidual
SMEs unavailable for reviewHighHighNo SME time booked in the planClient sponsorConfirm named SMEs and review windows before developmentMedium
Source content incompleteHighHighTwo of six modules have no sourceContent leadGap-fill workshop or reduce scope to available contentMedium
AI practice ungovernedHighHighNo review controls definedSolutions ArchitectEstablish grounding, SME sign-off, and release gateLow
LMS package unverifiedMediumHighNo test package attemptedLMS adminValidate a sample package in week oneLow
Accessibility undefinedMediumMediumNo standard named in the SOWDesign leadSet the standard and bake checks into QALow
Facilitation owner unclearMediumMediumNo named workshop ownerProject ManagerAssign a facilitator owner and certification pathLow

These projects are original solution-architecture demonstrations created to show my consulting approach. The organizations, requirements, data, budgets, vendors, timelines, and results shown are fictional and do not represent previous clients or employers.