All work

Case / 003 · The tradeoff problem

Three platforms. No neutral requirements.

Every stakeholder had a favorite. The way out was not a longer feature list—it was making everyone show which requirements mattered enough to accept a tradeoff.

Why the shortlist stalled

Twenty-five thousand learners—and no platform that is best at everything.

A workforce organization serves 25,000 learners and needs a platform decision.

  • LMS or LXP
  • Credentials
  • Instructor-led support
  • Employer reporting
  • Mobile access
  • Analytics
  • AI-assisted content production
  • Privacy controls
  • Integrations

Your turn · Live recommendation

What are you willing to trade away?

Change the weight of any requirement and watch the recommendation respond. The arithmetic is easy; defending the weights is the real work.

Platform North

Enterprise LMS. Strong at scale, credentialing, analytics, and integrations; heavier to administer.

Platform Beacon

Lightweight LXP. Fast to launch, budget-friendly, easy admin; weaker on credentials and AI.

Platform Forge

AI-forward platform. Best at content production and skills; more expensive, newer, admin-heavy.

RequirementWeightNorthBeaconForge
Learner volume (25k+)323
Budget fit231
Timeline to launch232
Accessibility323
Mobile access332
Credentialing313
E-commerce231
Instructor-led support322
Skills tracking223
AI content production213
Analytics323
APIs / integrations323
Privacy controls323
Admin capacity fit231
Weighted total

The part demos skip

The platform still has to live with everything you already own.

A strong score means little if credentials cannot travel, data cannot leave, or the team cannot support the administration.

These projects are original solution-architecture demonstrations created to show my consulting approach. The organizations, requirements, data, budgets, vendors, timelines, and results shown are fictional and do not represent previous clients or employers. Platform North, Beacon, and Forge are fictional and do not represent real vendors.